Latest whitepaper
Get your free 24 page whitepaper in your mailbox

This white paper contains more detailed info about our services and equipment. Also, you get inside tips from our experts.

We will not share your information with anyone. Please see our privacy statement for more information.
Conbit is working on oil and gas assets all around the globe
You will receive the whitepaper within 10 minutes in your mailbox.
While waiting...
We invite you to visit our YouTube channel here.
Didn't receive anything?
Please send us an email and one of our team members will send it through to you.
info@conbit.eu
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Wind
Blog
Offshore wind farm
12/10/2020

Who Should Maintain Floating Offshore Wind Turbines?

The floating offshore wind market is in its infancy. The first signs of a new flourishing industry are on the horizon. However, who should maintain the floating offshore wind turbines?

Maintenance on floating wind turbines

O&M Market Potential

Conbit analysts forecast the number of major component replacements on offshore wind turbines expected globally until 2040. The results need a response from the market.

The maintenance market is limited in size. It shows that the turbines are unlikely to fail. However, how will major components be replaced when they do?

The analysts have forecasted that the first floating wind turbine component will need replacing in 2025. These initial replacements are expected to be in the early phase technology and can be serviced by crane vessels. 

The market potential will grow from five major component replacements yearly from 2030 onwards to over 15 by 2035. These overhauls are predicted to be in tall turbines and further out to sea. Also, most of the projects will be in Europe and Asia. 

Floating wind turbines have global potential, which will result in a scattered market.

Characteristics

Due to the nature of floating offshore wind farms, the maintenance strategy is complex. The wind farms are located in remote areas, further away from the shore. Logistical aspects and workability due to the weather make extensive maintenance challenging. Furthermore, the turbines are becoming taller and their components heavier.

Exchange Strategies of Major Components

Two main strategies are considered viable: onshore overhaul and offshore overhaul. The onshore overhaul requires towing the turbine to shore, while offshore handling requires lifting in the offshore environment.

Onshore: Tow-To-Port

The turbine will be disconnected from the wind park and towed to shore. Once arrived on the quayside, a land-based crane will replace the major components. After the maintenance, the turbine will then be towed back to the wind park and re-connected.

Offshore Overhaul

Two approaches are considered feasible: lifting by crane vessel or lifting by temporary equipment. The traditional method for replacing heavy components in offshore turbines relies on crane vessels. The crane vessel is positioned alongside and replaces the major component.

Companies like Conbit and Mammoet are now developing the use of temporary lifting equipment. This approach is based on lifting systems that are temporarily connected to the wind turbine. The lifting system will replace the major component before it is disconnected and transported back to shore.

The Future of Major Overhauls

The currently available marine assets will not be able to serve the offshore wind market. The wind farm installation vessels are used to install bottom-fixed structures and are based on jack-up technologies. Because floating wind farms are located in deeper waters, using the jack-up principle will not be possible.

The market for replacing components in floating offshore wind turbines is too small to allow significant investments in new crane vessels. No other application is identified for the new type of vessels required for this market.

If a marine spread is available that can replace major components, it will be occupied and unavailable for corrective maintenance. The global nature of the floating wind market will require lifting capacity in many parts of the world. One vessel cannot serve the whole market because of long mobilization times.

Tow-to-port is a realistic concept. However, it will require complex mooring and anchoring systems to make an effective (dis)connection. The marine spread requirement should not be underestimated as it can impact the required weather window.

Another often overlooked challenge is the lack of land-based cranes suitable for performing the replacement on the quayside. The cranes were available during the construction phase but are unlikely to be near the floating wind farm due to other projects. These cranes are often servicing long-term projects because their mobilization costs are high.

Conbit’s solution

Conbit has chosen to use temporary lifting systems to replace major components in floating wind turbines. The equipment will be available in other industries, thus reducing the investment risk and actual rental costs.
Temporary systems can be transported to remote locations within a few days. The marine spread requirements are limited, and suitable assets are readily available globally.

Temporary Lifting Systems

Two types of temporary lifting systems are currently being developed. One is based on modular equipment, while the other is a dedicated offshore turbine crane. Below are the two concepts developed by Conbit and Mammoet, respectively.

Modular Systems by Conbit

Conbit is developing a lifting system based on modular components that are assembled at the top of the wind turbine. Lifting is done by winches that remain at the base of the turbine.

“This is the right time to make provisions to enable the safe and cost-effective replacement of components inside floating offshore wind turbines. Conbit is investing to serve the future offshore wind market." 

~ Bram van Oirschot, Sales Manager, Conbit 

Turbine Crane by Mammoet

Mammoet is developing a dedicated turbine crane, which connects to the turbine tower and nacelle. All lifting is done from within the turbine crane.

Both concepts are in a late stage of development and nearing market readiness. Both systems require less investment than new floating cranes. It is expected that the service based on temporary cranes will be more economical than the tow-to-port strategy. Both these systems can be transported to project locations around the world within several days.

Challenge

The main challenge is to integrate the design of these systems with the turbine design. The loads resulting from these systems must be incorporated into the design of wind turbines. 

Conbit and Mammoet are both optimistic about the feasibility. Currently, the two parties are in discussion with turbine manufacturers to overcome this challenge. Load guidance during the lifting is also essential in both concepts. Both parties have created bespoke solutions, and potential partners have been selected to address this aspect.  

See how we got to work

Share this article

Author

Bram van Oirschot

Commercial Director

General

Conbit B.V.

General contact info

Related Blogs

Related Cases

Related Services

Maritime
Wind
Oil & Gas

Inspections

Onshore & Offshore
Oil & Gas
Petrochemical
Wind

Modification

Onshore & Offshore
Oil & Gas
Petrochemical
Wind

Maintenance

Onshore & Offshore
Oil & Gas
Wind
Petrochemical
Maritime

Installation

Onshore & Offshore

Contact

We're here to answer your questions

Do you have any technical questions, general enquiries or do you need additional information? Don’t hesitate to contact our experts. With their expertise and experience in lifting services, they will gladly help you.

You can contact us by phone or email. We’re looking forward to your questions!
Bram van Oirschot

Bram van Oirschot

Commercial Director